The Violent Attack in Arizona on Gabrielle Giffords and Others

2 Comments
Join the Conversation
The Mental Health Crisis - Art Explosion
The Mental Health Crisis - Art Explosion
A look at the Arizona attacks and mental health care in the United States.

A shooting in Arizona led to six deaths and several injuries. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Arizona, was shot in the head. The national discussion has focused on rabid right-wing rhetoric and loose gun laws, but the most significant contributing factor in this tragedy may be the current state of mental health care in the U.S.

Sarah Palin and Political Rhetoric

Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik was one of the first officials to speak publicly about the incident. In a press conference on Saturday night, he cited “rhetoric about hatred, about mistrust of government, about paranoia of how government operates” as a likely influence on the shooter. Giffords had been holding a “Congress on the Corner” event when she was shot. A federal judge in attendance was killed.

Since then, public discussion has focused on recent examples of political speech that many see as harsh or extreme, particularly when it has come from the right. Sarah Palin has been criticized for posting a map with a symbol resembling cross-hairs on Giffords’ districts and others. These districts were headed by Democrats who voted for the health care bill. Radio host Joyce Kaufman’s November comments that “if ballots don’t work, bullets will” have also been recycled and added to the national discussion.

Efforts to Tighten Gun Control Laws

Since the attacker used a gun, many gun control advocates have suggested that a change in the gun laws could prevent similar attacks in the future. Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D) of New York is hoping to restrict the legal number of ammunition rounds to 10. “I'm asking my sportsmen, and certainly gun owners, to really think about this,” she said. Rep. Peter King (R) of New York would like to prevent people from carrying a firearm within 1,000 feet of “high profile” government officials.

However, there is very little evidence changing the rhetoric or the gun laws in the United States would have prevented this act of violence. While no one has been convicted in this case, the chief suspect is 22-year-old Jared Loughner, whose political views do not have much connection to any mainstream U.S. political party. He seems to be mentally ill, so current laws should have kept him from buying a gun. The most likely cause of this violent attack is the difficulty of serving the mentally ill under the current U.S. system of health care and laws.

Mental Illness Treatment and Laws

“Nationwide, the mental health care system is broken,” says Michael J. Fitzpatrick, Executive Director, National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) in a statement on the tragedy in Arizona. The stigma associated with mental illness, laws that require treatment only if a person is known to be a danger and deep cuts in mental health programs prevent many mentally ill people from getting appropriate treatment.

Although many forms of severe psychiatric illness first become obvious when people are between the ages of 18-25 years old, many young people are unwilling to seek help. They worry their peers may judge them harshly. Even when parents, teachers or other adults recognize that a young person is mentally ill, civil rights laws make it difficult to force a person to obtain treatment.

However, A large part of the problem is the lack of available space for people who do seek treatment. According to a 2008 study by The Treatment Advocacy Cente, “42 of the 50 states have less than half the minimum number of beds considered to be reasonable by knowledgeable experts. Most consider Arizona to be among the worst of all the states in meeting the needs of its mentally ill.

While much political rhetoric is needlessly inflammatory, and gun laws could be tightened or more effectively enforced, the most logical response to this horrible incident is a thorough examination of current mental health laws, policies and funding. Appropriate treatment of the mentally ill prevents violence.

Sources

Fitzpatrick, Michael “The Arizona Tragedy and Mental Health Care” January 11, 2011

Hughes, Siobhan “Arizona Killings Prompt Another Gun-Control Push” Wall Street Journal January 11, 2011

Mayo, Michael “Did inflammatory speech fuel Arizona rampage? Sun Sentinel January 11, 2011

Montopoli, Brian and Robert Hendin. “Sarah Palin Criticized Over Gabrielle Giffords Presence on "Target List"” CBS News Political Hotsheet Blog January 8, 2011

Teacher at Heart, Beth Ellen McKinney

Beth Ellen McKinney - I am a credentialed teacher with many years of experience in a variety of settings. I currently teach at an alternative high school in an ...

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 7+9?

Comments

Jan 13, 2011 12:17 AM
Guest :
Although it was a surprise that this happened, it was not a surprise that a male did it. The most common trait for murders is that most of them have testicles. Males commit 90% of all murders. It was a surprise that this male killed several women as males are also the most common victim of murders for both the males that kill and the small percentage of women who do.

It is also not a surprise that Gabby survived this injury as women do survive injuries better than their male counterparts. Women survive brain injuries better than males do also.
Even though I am a male, I can recognize that males cause most of the world's problems.

Wars are one example. The main problem with recent wars is that far too many women and children become casualties in bombings and fighting. IF we have to have wars, we need to go back to the old way of fighting where women and children were protected. In the Civil War, although over 660 thousand males died, only 60 women did. Like it or not, males are more expendable as a whole than are women so if we do have to have them, only males should fight them. (This is not because I think women cannot do the job, after all, since women have had an equal chance, women have been surpassing males in almost every area so whatever males can do, we know women can do better)

All of this shows that women and not us males are the superior gender by far. Maybe it is time for us males to move out of the way and let women take control. We know they can do a far better job than we males have done.
Feb 21, 2011 8:27 AM
Guest :
i guess it was of but i still liked it
2 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement